Template:Citation needed/doc

Citation needed is a template used to identify claims in articles, particularly if questionable, that need a citation to a reliable source. This template produces the superscripted message and is installed with no spaces directly after punctuation.

Use


Notes:
 * The date parameter consists of the full English name of the current month (with initial capital and rest lowercase), a space, and the year. For example, "January 2013" but not "jan13" or "January 23, 2013". Deviation from this rule will place the article in Category:Articles with invalid date parameter in template.
 * To automatically add the current date, you can use template substitution:.
 * If the date parameter is not given, a bot will soon add it (AnomieBOT's TagDater task) but it's better if you add it yourself to avoid an extra edit to the article's history.


 * The reason parameter is for an explanation why you think the material needs a source. It is optional but very helpful. It is displayed as a tooltip in some browsers (hover the mouse here to check behaviour of your browser). For example, the following usage might be appropriate to the claim that "Humphrey Bogart was an avid snooker player":
 * Use only plain text for the reason parameter. It does not support wiki markup like wikilinks, which can mess up the tooltip.
 * Double quotation marks used within the reason parameter will likewise mess up the tooltip; use single quotes or the HTML code  instead.
 * If omitted, the tooltip "This claim needs references to reliable sources." is used by default.
 * If omitted, the tooltip "This claim needs references to reliable sources." is used by default.


 * This template should usually be installed directly after punctuation, such as a full stop (period) or a comma.
 * Use of this template places the article into Category:All articles with unsourced statements and Category:Articles with unsourced statements from August 2024 (example; past months are listed in Category:Articles with unsourced statements).
 * Remove the template when you add a citation for a statement.

Example 1


This wikitext will be rendered as follows:


 * This sentence shows the template used at the end.

Example 2


The template indicates that it may be that Humphrey Bogart played snooker at some point and it may be that he was enthusiastic about the game but no reliable, published sources were given to verify it and the information is not considered common knowledge.


 * Humphrey Bogart was an avid snooker player.

Example 3
If it is considered that he might have played snooker but was not an avid player, a reason for the need of a citation may be given, displayed as a tooltip when the mouse hovers on "citation needed":




 * Humphrey Bogart was an avid snooker player.

In this example, it may be better to use the Citation needed span, which has slightly different syntax, template to highlight the word "avid".

When not to use this template
Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately. Do not tag it; immediately remove it. This includes material that is disparaging, misrepresentative, insulting, harmful, or possibly libelous. For some policy about this, see the sections "Remove contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced" at Biographies of living persons and "Burden of evidence" at Verifiability.

The template is intended for use when there is a general question of the verifiability of a statement, or when an editor believes that a reference verifying the statement should be provided. Other templates are available for other or more specific issues; see the list of inline templates. For example, claims that you think are incorrect should be tagged with Dubious, and those which represent a non-neutral view should be tagged with POV statement. Being specific about the nature of the problem will help other editors correct it.

Within a lead section that is clearly written as a summary of a substantially sourced article,
 * statements that are supported with citations within the body of the article should not be tagged,
 * statements that are not supported in the article body should be tagged with Not verified in body.

If you have the time and ability to find an authoritative reference, please do so. Then add the citation yourself, or correct the article text. After all, the ultimate goal is not to merely identify problems, but to fix them.

While an editor may add this template to any uncited passage for any reason, many editors object to what they perceive as overuse of this tag, particularly in what is known as "drive-by" tagging, which is applying the tag without attempting to address the issues at all. Consider whether adding this tag in an article is the best approach before using it, and use it judiciously. Wikipedia's verifiability policy does not require reliable sources for common well-known facts (e.g., "the Moon orbits the Earth"), neither that citations be repeated through every sentence in a paragraph. All direct quotations and facts whose accuracy might be challenged (e.g., statistics) require citations. See WP:MINREF for the list of material that is absolutely required to be followed by an inline citation, rather than a general reference or no citation at all. Also note that the burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material.

This template is intended for specific passages that need citation. For entire articles or sections that contain significant material lacking citations (rather than just specific short passages), there are other, more appropriate templates, such as Unreferenced and More citations needed (for whole articles) as well as Unreferenced section and More citations needed section (for sections of articles).

Do not use this template to tag policies or guidelines.

How to respond to this tag
The addition of this tag is a request for an inline citation to support the tagged statement. If you are able to provide a citation to support the claim, then please do so.

Except for contentious claims about living people, which should be immediately removed if not cited, there is no specific deadline for providing citations. Please do not delete information that you believe is correct solely because no one has provided a citation within an arbitrary time limit. If there is some uncertainty about its accuracy, most editors are willing to wait at least a month to see whether a citation can be provided.

Template data
{	"description": "The template is used to identify claims in articles, particularly if questionable, that need a citation to a reliable source.", "params": { "date": { "label": "Month and year", "description": "Provides the month and year of the citation request; e.g., 'January 2013', but not 'jan13'", "type": "string", "autovalue": " ", "suggested": true },		"reason": { "label": "Reason for citation", "description": "A reason as to why, or for what content, the citation is needed; use single quotes, if any", "type": "string" }	} }

Tracking categories

 * – a hidden maintenance/tracking category which is added to pages using this template with unsupported parameters

Inline templates

 * Additional citation needed: request addition of more sources.
 * Quote without source: request source for quotations.
 * Clarify: request clarification of wording or interpretation.
 * Example needed: request examples for clarification.
 * Nonspecific: flag a general, yet factual statement as needing to be made more specific before it can be verified.
 * Page needed: request a page number for an existing citation.

Highlighting some text that needs a citation

 * Citation needed span: similar, except that the text needing the citation is changed to a dark slate-gray color while being encapsulated in an off-white box with a pale pink outline. For example:
 * Beetles constitute the largest order of insects, with

Incomplete citations

 * Deep link needed: inline request for the exact web page. Use when a web site is referenced but the exact web page is not given.
 * Full citation needed: inline request for full citation, for example when only author, year are given.
 * Incomplete short citation: inline warning and request for enough information to allow the short citation to uniquely identify a long citation.
 * Page needed: inline request for the page number(s) in a work that support a citation.
 * Time needed: inline request for the specific time in a recording that supports the citation; see: minutes or time in.
 * Season needed, similar to page needed: for missing TV season and episode number.
 * Volume needed, similar to page needed: for missing journal, newspaper, comic, volume and issue numbers, etc.

Verification

 * Better source needed: flags a statement as requiring a better source.
 * Dead link: tag a ref or an external link as dead.
 * Failed verification: source was checked, and did not contain the cited material.
 * Request quotation: request a direct quote from an inaccessible source, for verification purposes.
 * Self-published inline or Self-published source : flag a source that cites the author.
 * Unreliable source?: flag a source as possibly being unreliable or unverifiable.
 * Verify source: request that someone verify the cited source backs up the material in the passage.

Content

 * According to whom: flag a vague, unreferenced, third-party claim with no specific, identifiable individuals or groups named who could verify the claim.
 * By whom: flag a statement that has a claim by a third party who is not well identified and/or well sourced.
 * Chronology citation needed/: request a source confirming or providing the chronology or timeline of a statement.
 * Definition: flag a definition as being ambiguous or confusing.
 * Dubious: flag something as suspected of being incorrect; explain why on the talk page and briefly in the |reason= parameter.
 * Original research inline: flag a statement as possibly containing original research.
 * Peacock term: flag a statement that contains peacock terms.
 * POV statement: flag something as possibly not having a neutral point of view.
 * Quantify: flag a statement as being vague regarding the amount of something.
 * Technical inline: flag a word or phrase that is both technical and not understandable.
 * Undue weight inline: flag a statement that does not ascribe appropriate weight to its sources, according to their levels of prominence.
 * Vague: flag a statement that is too vague to be unambiguously verifiable.
 * Weasel inline: flag a statement that contains weasel words.
 * When: flag a statement that has a time period that's vague or ambiguous.
 * Who: flag a statement that needs a description or identification of a person or group of persons.

Timeliness

 * Update after: a template that only shows itself after a specified time, indicating an exceptional statement that will date quickly.

Article message box templates

 * Cite check: article or section may have inappropriate or misinterpreted citations.
 * More citations needed: article or section has weak or incomplete sources, references, or citations.
 * Unreferenced: article or section has no sources, references, or citations given at all.
 * Citation method and style
 * Citation style
 * No footnotes